Waterpik is more effective but that does not mean airfloss is ineffective.
Waterpik water flosser vs philips airfloss.
Another study shows the waterpik water flosser to be more effective than sonicare air floss at reducing gingivitis.
Clinical studies have proven the waterpik water flosser to be significantly more effective than the air flosser at removing plaque from tooth surfaces when combined with a manual toothbrush.
The price is almost always a deciding factor when buying a flosser a whitening mouthwash or anything else really.
But if you travel a lot or you are unable to use water pick for whatever reason get airfloss.
While waterpik uses a focused stream of water to loosen plaque and food particles.
Sonicare airfloss uses a stream of air interspersed with small micro droplets of water.
In fact airfloss uses just one teaspoon of water total.
Both products also allow users to add mouthwash to enhance the cleaning process and provide a fresh clean sensation.
While the sonicare airfloss does use some droplets of water most of its power centers around small intermittent bursts of air while the waterpik uses a continuous stream of water.
Waterpik water flosser cleans more completely than airfloss no doubt about it.
Both airfloss and waterpik are made of quality fda approved materials.
So if you can get a waterpik it is even more effective than regular floss.
Philips airfloss vs waterpik philips sonicare airfloss is generally more expensive than waterpik.
The short answer is waterpik.
Waterpik water flossers and sonicare airfloss are the best known examples but which is better.